Legal Opinion

Thomas v. Garraghty

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided August 23, 2001No. 00-1574PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

KAREN NELSON MOORE, Circuit Judge.

In this case, Petitioner-Appellant Donnell Latron Thomas appeals the district court’s denial of his petition for habeas corpus relief pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. Thomas claims that his Sixth Amendment Confrontation Clause and his Fourteenth Amendment Due Process Clause rights were violated when the prosecutor in his criminal trial called a witness to the stand knowing that the witness would refuse to testify. According to Thomas, the witness’s refusal to testify was inherently prejudicial and warrants a new trial. For the following reasons, we AFFIRM…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Williams v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  2. Smith v. PhillipsSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  3. Douglas v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  4. Frazier v. CuppSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  5. Penry v. JohnsonSupreme Court of the United States · 2001

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Jackson v. TaskilaDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API