Thomas v. Garraghty
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
KAREN NELSON MOORE, Circuit Judge.
In this case, Petitioner-Appellant Donnell Latron Thomas appeals the district court’s denial of his petition for habeas corpus relief pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. Thomas claims that his Sixth Amendment Confrontation Clause and his Fourteenth Amendment Due Process Clause rights were violated when the prosecutor in his criminal trial called a witness to the stand knowing that the witness would refuse to testify. According to Thomas, the witness’s refusal to testify was inherently prejudicial and warrants a new trial. For the following reasons, we AFFIRM…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Williams v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Smith v. PhillipsSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Douglas v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Frazier v. CuppSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Penry v. JohnsonSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Jackson v. TaskilaDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2022