Legal Opinion

Wolf v. Wolf

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided June 15, 1857PublishedCited by 13 opinions

APPEAL from the Fifth District Court of New Orleans, Augustin, J.

1Opinion of the CourtMerrick, C. J.

This ease will be best understood by a statement of facts in the order in which they occurred.

On the 29th day of June, 1855, Daniel Wolf by an act executed in the presence of two witnesses and a notary public, made a formal act of sale of a house and certain lots, and certain other real estate inthe city of New Orleans, to Price, Walsh & Go., for the nominal sum of $10,000, acknowledged in the act to have been paid. The plaintiff, Anna R. Wolf, made herself a party to the act of sale and renounced in favor of the purchaser her tacit mortgages and privileges.

On the second day of July, the said…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Slocomb v. Real Estate Bank of ArkansasSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1842
  2. Platt v. WellsThe Superior Court of New York City · 1864

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Gautreaux v. HarangSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1938
  2. Read v. HewittSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1907
  3. Barnes v. BarnesSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1924
  4. Latiolais v. BreauxSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1923
  5. Jackson v. GolsonLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1956

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API