Legal Opinion

Luedeke v. Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co.

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided July 9, 1930No. 27295PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDay, J.

This action was brought to recover damages which the plaintiff claims resulted by reason of the negligence of the defendant in obstructing certain streets with a freight train and delaying the fire department in reaching the *126plaintiff’s property which was burning. The defendant-appeals to this court from a judgment in favor of the plaintiff.

The defendant sets up as an affirmative defense that the plaintiff, by written agreement, had assumed all risk of loss by fire to the property destroyed; that he had released the defendant from all such claims and had agreed to indemnify it for any loss.…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Checkley v. Illinois Central RailroadIllinois Supreme Court · 1913
  2. Missouri Pacific Railway Co. v. NebraskaSupreme Court of the United States · 1910
  3. Omaha & Republican Valley Railway Co. v. TalbotNebraska Supreme Court · 1896
  4. James Quirk Milling Co. v. Minneapolis & St. Louis RailroadSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1906
  5. Hanlon Drydock & Shipbuilding Co. v. Southern Pacific Co.California Court of Appeal · 1928

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Hill v. Carolina Freight Carriers Corp.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1952
  2. Gilbert v. New Mexico Const. Co.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1935
  3. Mathine v. Kansas-Nebraska Natural Gas Co., Inc.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1972
  4. Wasko v. ManellaConnecticut Appellate Court · 2002
  5. Cottonwood Fibre Co. v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1949

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API