Legal Opinion

Dole v. Wooldredge

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided May 19, 1883PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtColburn, J.

According to the allegations in this bill in equity, the plaintiffs, who were associated with the defendant for the purchase of a mine, for their common benefit, with a view to the profit to be made from it by organizing a corporation to work it, were grossly deceived and defrauded by the defendant, who stood in a fiduciary relation to them, in his representations of the sum paid for the mine; and they seek for an account from the defendant of his dealings in the purchase of the mine for the common benefit, and to have the matter so *141adjusted that each shall have contributed the sums mutually…

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. Noyes v. BraggMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1915
  2. Warren v. Grocery Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1896

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API