Barnett v. Eureka Paving Co.
Texas Commission of Appeals
Error to Court of Civil Appeals of Ninth Supreme Judicial District. Action by Bessie B. Barnett against the Eureka Paving Company. Prom a judgment of the Court of Civil Appeals (216 S. W. 903) reversing a judgment in her favor, plaintiff brings error.
1Opinion of the CourtKittrell, J.
The litigation out of which the appeal in this case arose had its origin in the filing of an action April 30, 1917, by the city of Houston for the use and benefit of defendant in error, against plaintiff in error, both in her individual capacity and as independent executor of the will of her deceased husband, W. W. Barnett. The action was No. 72518.
The purpose of the action was to obtain judgment for the amount of a certain paving certificate issued by the city of Houston and payable by said Barnett, deceased, and to foreclose a lien on'lot 5 and 50x75 feet of lot 11 in block No. 142.
There is…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Crawford v. McDonaldTexas Supreme Court · 1895
- Templeton v. FergusonTexas Supreme Court · 1895
- Higgins v. BordagesTexas Supreme Court · 1895
- Hargadene, McKittrick & Co. v. WhitfieldTexas Supreme Court · 1888
- Wood v. WheelerTexas Supreme Court · 1851
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Gehret v. HetkesTexas Commission of Appeals · 1931
- Curtis Sharp Custom Homes, Inc. v. Glover, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1985
- Benson v. MangumCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1938
- Tanton v. State Nat. Bank of El PasoCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1931
- Newman v. City of El PasoCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1934
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.