Legal Opinion

Board of Trade of Chicago v. Interstate Commerce Commission

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided April 16, 1981No. Nos. 80-1309, 80-1470PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

WILL, Senior Judge.

Petitioners appeal from a decision of the Interstate Commerce Commission that certain tariff schedules filed by the intervening respondent railroads are not unlawful under the Interstate Commerce Act. For the reasons hereinafter stated, we reverse and remand.

*1189I

Prior to 1976, rates from Chicago1 to eastern destinations for wheat and wheat products which arrived in Chicago by rail, lake vessel, or barge were lower than rates from Chicago to eastern destinations for wheat and wheat products which arrived in Chicago by for-hire motor carrier. This difference resulted from the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Keogh v. Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1922
  2. Bunn v. Caterpillar Tractor Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1977
  3. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1977

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Board of Trade of the City of Chicago v. The Interstate Commerce Commission, Baltimore & Ohio Railroad Company, Intervening the Peavey Company v. The Interstate Commerce Commission, Baltimore & Ohio Railroad Company, InterveningCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1981

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API