Legal Opinion

Moceri v. Canton Charter Township

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided July 1, 1994No. Docket No. 155596PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

Defendant Canton Charter Township appeals by leave granted from the trial court order that denied its motion for summary disposition. We reverse, because we are constrained to do so. Under Administrative Order No. 1994-4, we are obligated to follow the majority opinion in Listanski v Canton Charter Twp, 206 Mich App 356; 523 NW2d 229 (1994). However, we believe the arguments made in the minority opinion in Listanski and the opinion of Williams v Redford Twp, reported above, which also reluctantly followed Listanski because it was obligated to do so, are more persuasive. Were it not for…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Listanski v. Canton Charter TownshipMichigan Court of Appeals · 1994

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Listanski v. Canton TownshipMichigan Supreme Court · 1996
  2. Listanski v. Canton TownshipMichigan Supreme Court · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API