Legal Opinion
Ray v. Ohio Dep't of Health
Ohio Court of Appeals
Decided June 5, 2018No. 17AP-526PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBrown, P.J.
{¶ 1} Plaintiff-appellant, Carol Ray, appeals from a judgment of the Court of Claims of Ohio which granted the Civ.R. 56 motion for summary judgment of defendant-appellee, Ohio Department of Health ("ODH"), finding appellant's termination was not based on her disabilities and that ODH was not required to engage in the interactive process with appellant for a reasonable accommodation.
{¶ 2} In 1990, appellant began working at ODH in the Office of General Counsel. She was an at-will employee. Appellant was diagnosed with depression after the birth of her son in 1993 and treated with medication.…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- St. Mary's Honor Center v. HicksSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Plumbers & Steamfitters Joint Apprenticeship Committee v. Ohio Civil Rights CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1981
- Manzer v. Diamond Shamrock Chemicals Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1994
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Anderson v. Bright Horizons Children's Ctrs., L.L.C.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2022
- Creveling v. Lakepark Industries, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2021
- Abdullah v. Ohio State Univ.Ohio Court of Claims · 2025
- Asamoah v. Amazon.com Services, Inc.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 2022
- Feerasta v. Univ. of AkronOhio Court of Claims · 2022
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.