State v. Lyon
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Concurrence
NEWMAN, J.,
specially concurring.
I concur in the majority’s holding that the trial court committed reversible error when it permitted Stephenson to testify to the hearsay statements that defendant’s father made. I disagree with the majority, however, with respect to the evidence of defendant’s pre-arrest polygraph examination. The trial court should have granted defendant’s motion to suppress that evidence.
Defendant argues that polygraph evidence should never be admissible, even if a defendant stipulates to its admissibility. In the alternative, he argues that polygraph evidence should not be…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Faretta v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- State v. BrownOregon Supreme Court · 1984
- People v. BaynesIllinois Supreme Court · 1981
- State v. ValdezArizona Supreme Court · 1962
- Pulakis v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1970
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.