Legal Opinion · Concurrence

State v. Lyon

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided February 11, 1987No. 23-853; CA A35195Published

1Concurrence

NEWMAN, J.,

specially concurring.

I concur in the majority’s holding that the trial court committed reversible error when it permitted Stephenson to testify to the hearsay statements that defendant’s father made. I disagree with the majority, however, with respect to the evidence of defendant’s pre-arrest polygraph examination. The trial court should have granted defendant’s motion to suppress that evidence.

Defendant argues that polygraph evidence should never be admissible, even if a defendant stipulates to its admissibility. In the alternative, he argues that polygraph evidence should not be…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Faretta v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  2. State v. BrownOregon Supreme Court · 1984
  3. People v. BaynesIllinois Supreme Court · 1981
  4. State v. ValdezArizona Supreme Court · 1962
  5. Pulakis v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1970

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API