Legal Opinion

Hill v. Shaw

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided June 29, 1940No. 28195PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtStephens, P. J.

(After stating the foregoing facts.) On August 19, 1937, Shaw entered into a contract with Hill, by which the former agreed to purchase from Hill a cemetery lot for $100, conditioned “upon the title being found to be good, legal, and unencumbered.” This contract recited that it was made on the part of Hill acting through his sales agent, Etheridge Sr. Hill executed a warranty deed in favor of Shaw, to be delivered to Shaw when the purchase-money was paid, which deed was placed-' with his attorney. The title to the lot, upon examination, was found to be “good, legal, and unencumbered.” It is…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Cornelia Bank v. First National BankSupreme Court of Georgia · 1930
  2. American Surety Co. v. County of BibbSupreme Court of Georgia · 1926
  3. Thrift Bros. v. BakerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1916
  4. Ross v. Glover-Ball Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1923

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Tidwell v. Amsouth Bank, N.A. (In Re Cavalier Homes of Georgia)United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Georgia · 1989
  2. Isom v. SchettinoCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1973
  3. Summer v. AllisonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1972
  4. Talmadge v. General Casualty Company of AmericaCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1953
  5. Browder v. CoxCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1951

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API