Legal Opinion

Corey Bernard Heard v. Antonio McClain, et al.

District Court, M.D. Alabama

Decided November 12, 2025No. 3:23-cv-00418Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA EASTERN DIVISION COREY BERNARD HEARD, ) AIS 227128, ) ) Petitioner, ) ) v. ) CASE NO. 3:23-cv-418-RAH-SMD ) ANTONIO MCCLAIN, et al., ) ) Respondents. ) MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER I. INTRODUCTION Corey Heard, an inmate proceeding pro se, filed a petition for writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2254. Thereafter, Respondents filed an Answer, arguing that Heard’s claims are time-barred, unexhausted, defaulted, and that he is otherwise not entitled to habeas relief. On September 8, 2023, the Court ordered Heard to show…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Schlup v. DeloSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  2. Holland v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 2010
  3. Calderon v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
  4. Sandvik v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1999
  5. San Martin v. McNeilCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2011

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API