Legal Opinion

Terrky v. Terrky

New York Supreme Court

Decided September 15, 1916PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Action to annul a marriage.

1Opinion of the CourtCropsey, J.

This is an undefended action to annul a marriage, upon the ground of plaintiff’s non-age. She was under .eighteen years of age at the time,of the marriage and has not lived with the defendant since she became eighteen. Before, bringing this, action, however, she, through her guardian ad litem, brought *595an action against the defendant for a separation; and the question here is whether the bringing of that action and the prosecution of it to judgment prevents the plaintiff from obtaining the relief here sought.

On the hearing it developed that the action for a separation had been tried two years…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Starbuck v. . StarbuckNew York Court of Appeals · 1903
  2. Conrow v. . LittleNew York Court of Appeals · 1889
  3. In re Estate of SwalesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1901
  4. In Re the Administration of the Estate of SwalesNew York Court of Appeals · 1902
  5. Herrman v. HerrmanNew York Supreme Court · 1916

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Russo v. RussoNew York Supreme Court · 1938
  2. McCoy v. Provident Life Insurance Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1930

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API