State v. Goodenow
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtDuncan, J.
This is a criminal case in which defendant appeals the trial court’s judgment convicting and sentencing her for three crimes — aggravated theft in the first degree, ORS 164.057; forgery in the first degree, ORS 165.013; and cheating, ORS 167.167 — and ordering her to forfeit $960,843.77 in lottery winnings that she obtained by purchasing a lottery ticket with a credit card that she was not authorized to use. On appeal, defendant argues that the forfeiture violates the Excessive Fines Clause of the Eighth Amendment to the United States Constitution.1 For the reasons below, we conclude that the…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- McDonald v. City of ChicagoSupreme Court of the United States · 2010
- Austin v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- United States v. BajakajianSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Browning-Ferris Industries of Vermont, Inc. v. Kelco Disposal, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Cooper Industries, Inc. v. Leatherman Tool Group, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2001
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- City of Seattle v. LongWashington Supreme Court · 2021
- City of Whitefish v. T. CurranMontana Supreme Court · 2026
- State v. TrombleyMontana Supreme Court · 2026
- Christopher Thigpen v. Best Home Care LLC, Department of Employment and Economic Development, ...Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2025
- Taquan Jones v. Hollywood Unlocked, Inc.District Court, C.D. California · 2022