Legal Opinion

Schienfeldt v. Norris

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided March 4, 1874PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Tort, to recover damages for injuries sustained by the plaintiff in being run over by a wagon in charge of the defendant’s ser vont in a public street, in the city of Boston.

Read the full summary

Tort, to recover damages for injuries sustained by the plaintiff in being run over by a wagon in charge of the defendant’s ser vont in a public street, in the city of Boston. Trial in the Su perior Court before Putnam, J., who, after a verdict for the plaintiff,' allowed the following bill of exceptions : “ The evidence introduced by the plaintiff to show ordinary care on his own part and negligence on the part of the defend ant’s servant, was as follows: The plaintiff testified: ‘ I keep store on Federal Street. On Friday, September 8, 1871, at quarter past seven o’clock in the morning, I…

1Opinion of the Court

By the Court.

The questions of ordinary care on the part of the plaintiff and negligence on the part of the defendant were rightly submitted to the jury upon the evidence.

Exceptions overruled.

2Cited by6 opinions

  1. Hennessey v. TaylorMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1905
  2. Driscoll v. West End Street Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1893
  3. Bouma v. DuboisMichigan Supreme Court · 1912
  4. Shapleigh v. WymanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1883
  5. Donovan v. BernhardMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1911

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API