Legal Opinion

Chattanooga Implement & Mfg. Co. v. Harland

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided December 15, 1921PublishedCited by 3 opinions

FROM HAMILTON. Error to the Circuit Court of Hamilton County. — Hon. Oscar Yarnell, Judge.

1Opinion of the Court

Mr. L. D. Smith, Special Judge,

delivered the opinion of the Court.

The defendant in error, a child under fourteen years of age, while assisting his father at work in the foundry of the plaintiff in error molding castings, was injured by reason of hot iron escaping from the forms and burning bis foot. Suit was brought by him to recover damages for personal injuries, and by his father to recover for loss'of services, against the plaintiff in error. The right of recovery, as the case comes to this court, is based upon an alleged violation of section 1 of chapter 57 of the Acts of 1911, which…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Kitts v. KittsTennessee Supreme Court · 1916

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Jones v. NoelCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1947
  2. Freeman v. LoydCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1948
  3. Perry v. Western Union Telegraph Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1928

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API