Legal Opinion

Seegers v. McCreery

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided April 25, 1894No. 3368PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Action by H. C. Hay against the Carolina Midland Railway Company, commenced September 26,1893. This was a motion to dismiss an appeal, which is fully explained by the order of refusal of April 25, 1894,

1Per curiam

This is a motion to dismiss an appeal. We are not aware of any precedent or law authorizing the dismissal of an appeal on the ground that it is frivolous, and, therefore, this ground for dismissal is not sustained. It appears, however, from an inspection of the case, that the motion to amend the answer by adding the defence of the statute of limitations, the refusal of which motion is the ground of appellant’s first exception, was not made until after the testimony of plaintiff in chief and the testimony of defendant had closed, and was necessarily addressed to the discretion of the court. It…

2Cited by7 opinions

  1. State v. JonesSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1911
  2. State v. BradfordSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1911
  3. State v. BethuneSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1912
  4. Miller v. Atlantic Coast Line R. R.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1913
  5. Mills v. Atlantic Coast Line R. R.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1910

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API