Legal Opinion

State v. Cady

Montana Supreme Court

Decided December 21, 2000No. 99-367PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Gray

¶1 Darrin William Cady appeals from the dismissal of his petition for postconviction relief by the Twenty-First Judicial District Court, Ravalli County. We affirm.

¶2 The sole issue on appeal is whether the District Court erred in rejecting Cady’s claim that he was denied effective assistance of counsel.

¶3 In March of 1996, Cady and another man were arrested in a Hamilton, Montana, motel room. The State of Montana charged Cady with possession of dangerous drugs with intent to sell and .with use or possession of property subject to forfeiture. He pled not guilty to the charges.

¶4 Five months…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Bishop v. StateMontana Supreme Court · 1992
  3. State v. HagenMontana Supreme Court · 1995
  4. State v. BoucherMontana Supreme Court · 1999
  5. State v. D'AMICOMontana Supreme Court · 2000

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. State v. WrightMontana Supreme Court · 2001
  2. State v. BeaversMontana Supreme Court · 2001
  3. State v. BeaversMontana Supreme Court · 2001
  4. Novak v. StateMontana Supreme Court · 2006
  5. Osterloth v. StateMontana Supreme Court · 2002

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API