Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Long Term Care Partners, LLC v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Decided February 5, 2008No. 06-1930, 07-1098Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in part

WILLIAMS, Chief Judge,

concurring in part and dissenting in part and concurring in the judgment:

I join in full in Parts I, III.B, and IV of the majority opinion and, accordingly, I concur in the result reached in Part V, affirming the dismissal of the complaint by Long Term Care Partners, LLC (“LTC Partners”). I write separately, however, because I believe that, in light of Arbaugh v. Y&H Corp., 546 U.S. 500, 126 S.Ct. 1235, 163 L.Ed.2d 1097 (2006), “final agency action” under § 704 of the Administrative Procedure Act (“APA”) is not a prerequisite for us to exercise subject matter…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  2. Warth v. SeldinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  3. Steel Co. v. Citizens for a Better EnvironmentSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
  4. Arbaugh v. Y & H Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2006
  5. Ruhrgas Ag v. Marathon Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1999

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API