Whitcomb v. Whitcomb

In this action the libellant was granted a divorce on the ground that the parties have lived apart for three consecutive years without fault on the part of the libellant, the resumption of marital relations not being reasonably probable.

The petition alleged five different grounds for a divorce. At the start of the trial the libellee moved that the libellant be required to elect the ground on which she would proceed. This motion was denied and the case is here on the exception taken to this' ruling of the court and on exceptions taken to certain findings of fact and the decree based thereon.

The…