T. M. v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Per curiam
The finding of the trial court that T. M. was guilty of burglary and petty theft is reversed. There is no evidence in this record that the respondent participated in the burglary or ever had possession of the fruits thereof. G. C. v. State, 407 So.2d 639 (Fla. 3d DCA 1981); J. L. B. v. State, 396 So.2d 761 (Fla. 3d DCA 1981); D. M. v. State, 394 So.2d 520 (Fla. 3d DCA 1981); P. R. v. State, 389 So.2d 1078 (Fla. 3d DCA 1980).
Reversed and remanded with instruction to discharge.
2Cases cited4 opinions
- J. L. B. v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1981
- G. C. v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1981
- D. M. v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1981
- P. R. v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1980
3Cited by2 opinions
- A.H. v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1983
- D.C. v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1983