Legal Opinion

Mercer v. Hogan

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided November 26, 1883No. Equity, No. 6139PublishedCited by 1 opinion

The Case is stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Cox

The history leading to this litigation may be stated in a very few words. Wm. Hogan, sr., who was the father of the female complainants and of the defendant, was the owner of a tract of land situated in Australia. In 1856 he employed the defendant, his son, to go to that country, with powers of attorney authorizing him to manage the property and make sale of it. When he first went, his absence was intended to be only a temporary one, but it turned out that he remained a number of years in that country. He collected rents from property and made sales, and out of these moneys made sundry…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Clark v. CallaghanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1834
  2. Nicholls v. Hodge'sU.S. Circuit Court for the District of District of Columbia · 1825

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Watkins v. RivesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1941

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API