Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Andrews

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided March 2, 1882PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMorton, C. J.

This is an indictment in four counts against Joseph B. Andrews, Caroline E. Andrews and Walter H. Weeks. The defendant Weeks seasonably filed a motion to quash the indictment, whereupon the attorney of the government entered a nolle prosequi as to the second count. The effect of this was to obviate the objections, in the motion to quash, to the second count, and to its joinder with the other counts. Being thus made immaterial, we need not consider them.

It is objected, “that the indictment contains no averments that the different counts are different descriptions of the same *264act, as required…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. WalkerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1871
  2. Commonwealth v. KingsburyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1809
  3. Commonwealth v. AdamsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1879

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. StuartMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1911
  2. People v. TavorminaNew York Court of Appeals · 1931
  3. State v. LarueWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1925
  4. Commonwealth v. MarsinoMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1925
  5. Commonwealth v. MaguireMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1943

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API