Legal Opinion · Dissent

Escambia County Board of County Commissioners v. Phipps

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided November 28, 1989No. 89-233Published

1DissentNimmons, Judge

The claimant, who was accepted as PTD by the E/C, has had back and knee surgery and wears both a back brace and a knee brace. It is apparently conceded that hydrotherapy is an effective means for relief of the claimant’s symptoms. But under the applicable case law, that does not necessarily entitle the claimant to an order requiring the E/C to provide for the construction and maintenance of a swimming pool at his home.

In my view, the claimant failed to present facts establishing the extremely unusual circumstances which this court has said are necessary in order to justify requiring the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Haga v. Clay Hyder Trucking LinesDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1981
  2. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. VaughnDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1980
  3. Sacred Heart Hospital v. GraftonDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1984
  4. United Sheet Metal Co. v. MeyerDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1988

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API