Legal Opinion

Farrell v. Branconmier

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided April 11, 1958PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCounihan, J.

This is a suit in equity in which the plaintiffs under G. L. (Ter. Ed.) c. 175, §§ 112 and 113, and G. L. (Ter. Ed.) c. 214, § 3 (10), seek to reach and apply in satisfaction of two judgments held by the plaintiffs against Branconmier, hereinafter called the insured, the obligation of the American Employers’ Insurance Company, hereinafter called the insurer, under a compulsory insurance policy issued by it to the insured under G. L. (Ter. Ed.) c. 90, § 34A, as amended. The policy covered the motor vehicle involved in the accident which caused injuries to the plaintiffs.

The judge ordered the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Graustein v. DolanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1933
  2. Phillips v. StoneMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1937
  3. Worcester Bank & Trust Co. v. EllisMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1935
  4. Kingsley v. SpoffordMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1937
  5. Desmarais v. Standard Accident InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1954

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Save-Mor Supermarkets, Inc. v. Skelly Detective Service, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1971
  2. Lynn v. NashawatyMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1981
  3. Commonwealth v. PacciaMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1958
  4. Wachusett Regional School District Committee v. EricksonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1967
  5. M.J.C. v. D.J.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1991

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API