Legal Opinion

Atlantic Greyhound Corp. v. North Carolina Utilities Commission

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided April 28, 1948PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSeawell, J.

These appeals, embracing much the same subject matter, were argued together, and will be here discussed as companion cases, avoiding, as far as possible, repetition in factual statement and history of the cases.

The controversy resulting in the appeals grew out of an application of the Seashore Company for a franchise that would permit it to operate a through bus service from coastal communities to Raleigh, beginning at Atlantic and Beaufort via Goldsboro, its western terminus, without the necessity of transfer to busses operated under franchise by the Greyhound Company or other franchise…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. United States v. LeeSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
  2. Switchmen's Union v. National Mediation BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
  3. Carpenter v. . R. R.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1922
  4. Moody v. State Prison.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1901
  5. Suddreth v. City of CharlotteSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1943

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. McLean v. KeithSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1952
  2. Porter v. North Carolina Department of InsuranceCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1979
  3. Potash Co. of America v. New Mexico Public Service CommissionNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1956
  4. Potash Co. of America v. New Mexico Public Service CommissionNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1956

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API