Legal Opinion · Dissent

Commonwealth v. Brobst

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided December 30, 1983No. Appeal No. 37 M.D. Appeal Docket 1982Published

1DissentHutchinson, Justice

I would reverse on the basis of Judge Wieand’s dissent in Superior Court, 303 Pa.Super. 161, 449 A.2d 626. In addition, I note that this appellee not only had counsel in Superior Court who argued the very issue of lack of knowledge of the potential sentence, but now has had the sentence imposed and therefore must be aware of what he faces. Nevertheless, he permitted his counsel to withdraw, and chose to appear pro se in this Court, declining the opportunity to have counsel’s assistance. Moreover, he has ignored notices of pending argument here and failed to file a brief or appear at oral…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Commonwealth v. BrobstSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1982

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API