Legal Opinion · Dissent

Harvest House Restaurant, Inc. v. City of Lynden

Washington Supreme Court

Decided August 16, 1984No. 50312-5Published

1DissentWilliams, C.J.

(dissenting) — I disagree that the issue in this case is moot, or of purely academic interest. Had the case become moot, the issue presented is one of substantial public interest, capable of recurring. I would reach the question of the validity of the City of Lynden's ordinance *374633 which prohibits all dancing in establishments where alcoholic beverages are sold. In resolution of that issue, the ordinance is not valid.

Generally, we do not review moot cases or proceedings. Leonard v. Bothell, 87 Wn.2d 847, 557 P.2d 1306 (1976); Grays Harbor Paper Co. v. Grays Harbor Cy., 74 Wn.2d 70, 442…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. California v. LaRueSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. Markham Advertising Co. v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1968
  3. Hartman v. Washington State Game CommissionWashington Supreme Court · 1975
  4. State v. LundquistWashington Supreme Court · 1962
  5. Leonard v. City of BothellWashington Supreme Court · 1976

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API