Legal Opinion

In re the Assessment of the Cost & Expense of the Laying of Sewers

New York Supreme Court

Decided September 27, 1929PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtRogers, J.

The applicants who filed and served objections to the assessment “ within the time and in the manner specified by law therefor ” are the only parties aggrieved who are entitled to maintain this proceeding. It is a special proceeding, and in order *813to maintain it the applicant must bring himself within its provisions by filing objections and by applying to a Special Term of the Supreme Court within twenty days after the confirmation of the assessment.

On July 8, 1929, at the trial, certain aggrieved parties asked to come in and be heard along with the applicants who had filed objections and duly…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Stuart v. . PalmerNew York Court of Appeals · 1878
  2. Jex v. Mayor, Aldermen & CommonaltyNew York Court of Appeals · 1886
  3. Tifft v. . City of BuffaloNew York Court of Appeals · 1880
  4. Matter of City of New York (Juniper Ave.)New York Court of Appeals · 1922
  5. Sanders v. . DownsNew York Court of Appeals · 1894

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. McCarty v. City of WatertownNew York Supreme Court · 1951

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API