Legal Opinion

Moran v. Roberge

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided February 27, 1891PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal from Tuscola. (Beach, J.) Bill to foreclose a mortgage. Defendant Wallace appeals. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtGrant, J.

Complainant was the holder of a promissory-note for $114.37, secured by a mortgage on real estate, and filed his bill to foreclose the mortgage. Defendants Roberge and Schram were the makers of the note. The mortgage given as security was executed by Roberge to defendant Sweet and Asa Fuller. Defendant Wallace was made a party as a subsequent mortgagee. Decree was *604entered for complainant, and defendant 'Wallace alone appealed.

There is but little, if any, dispute as to the material facts in the case, which are as follows: October' 15, 1879, Roberge and Schram bought from one John H. Tucker a…

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. Lowry v. BennettMichigan Supreme Court · 1899
  2. C. P. A. Company v. First Mortgage B. Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1939

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API