Legal Opinion

United States v. Concepcion

District Court, E.D. New York

Decided July 16, 1992No. CR 91-781, CR 91-821, CR 91-822, CR 91-844 to CR 91-848, CR 91-902, CR 91-936, CR 91-937, CR 91-1100, CR 91-1194, CR 91-1254, CR 91-1265, CR 91-1267, CR 91-1268, CR 91-1282, CR 91-1283 and CR 92-264PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

AMENDED MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

WEINSTEIN, District Judge:

[[Image here]]

These twenty defendants represent the first of approximately fifty-five who are being prosecuted in this court for fraudulently obtaining assistance from the Aid to Families with Dependent Children (AFDC), Food Stamp and Medicaid programs for the poor. The group now before the court consists primarily of Dominican women who bought, sold and used false identity documents and who bribed government employees to obtain government funds. Some of the defendants used as many as nine aliases and obtained upwards of $50,000 per year…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Pilot Life Insurance v. DedeauxSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  2. Heckler v. ChaneySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. Mistretta v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  4. Feres v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1950
  5. United States v. MenascheSupreme Court of the United States · 1955

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. United States v. John P. Rooney, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1994
  2. United States v. Andre RogersCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1992
  3. United States v. FerrantiDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1996
  4. United States v. EkwunohDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1993
  5. United States v. SessaDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1993

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API