Legal Opinion

Brancaccio v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided February 10, 2010No. 4D08-2664PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWarner, J.

Appellant, Victor Braneaccio, challenges the trial court’s denial of his motion for postconviction relief based upon newly discovered evidence. While the trial court found that evidence of the effects of the drug Zoloft could be considered newly discovered in that the drug warnings issued by the Food and Drug Administration came well after the trial in this action, it concluded that the evidence would not, as a matter of law, establish an involuntary intoxication defense and would not produce an acquittal on retrial. It thus denied the motion. We affirm.

To succeed on a motion for…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Jones v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1991
  2. Hallman v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1979
  3. Mills v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2001
  4. Brancaccio v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1997
  5. Hall v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1990

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Hunter v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2012
  2. Tyrell v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2013
  3. Rogero Wright v. State of FloridaDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2015
  4. Floyd v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API