Legal Opinion

Walker v. City of Birmingham

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided June 12, 1967No. 249Published

1Opinion of the Court 1

388 U.S. 307 (1967)

WALKER ET AL.

v.

CITY OF BIRMINGHAM.

No. 249.

Supreme Court of United States.

Argued March 13-14, 1967.

Decided June 12, 1967.

CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OF ALABAMA.

Jack Greenberg argued the cause for petitioners. With him on the briefs were James M. Nabrit III, Norman C. Amaker, Leroy D. Clark, Charles Stephen Ralston, Arthur D. Shores, Orzell Billingsley, Jr., and Anthony G. Amsterdam.

Earl McBee and J. M. Breckenridge argued the cause for respondent. With them on the brief was William C. Walker.

Louis F. Claiborne, by special leave of Court, argued the cause for the United…

Also in this document: Opinion of the Court · Stewart; Dissent · Douglas; Dissent · Brennan.

2Cases cited67 opinions

  1. Cantwell v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
  2. National Ass'n for the Advancement of Colored People v. ButtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  3. United States v. United Mine Workers of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  4. Thornhill v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
  5. Dombrowski v. PfisterSupreme Court of the United States · 1965

62 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API