Legal Opinion

Friends of the Ridge v. Baltimore Gas & Electric Co.

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided February 11, 1999No. 76, Sept. Term, 1998PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CATHELL, Judge.

In this case, Pamela and Carl Folio and Friends of the Ridge et al, petitioners, appeal the affirmance by the Court of Special Appeals 1 of the decision of the Circuit Court for Baltimore County, which upheld the granting of a variance from side yard setback requirements to Baltimore Gas and Electric Company, respondent. Petitioners present three issues for our review, which we rearrange:

[1] , Whether the Court of Special Appeals’ preference given to utility companies in this zoning case conflicts with this Court’s decision in Kahl vs. Consolidated Gas and Electric, 191 Md. 249…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Penn Central Transportation Co. v. New York CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. Cromwell v. WardCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1995
  3. State v. MurzdaSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1936
  4. Easter v. Mayor of BaltimoreCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1950
  5. Bressman v. GashSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1993

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Mayor and Council of Rockville v. Rylyns Enterprises, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 2002
  2. People's Counsel v. SurinaCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2007
  3. Berringer v. SteeleCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2000
  4. Jock v. Zoning Board of AdjustmentSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2005
  5. Stansbury v. JonesCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2002

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API