Legal Opinion
Hooper v. Hero Lands Co.
Louisiana Court of Appeal
Decided December 11, 2013No. 2013-CA-0576PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ROSEMARY LEDET, Judge.
| iThis is a boundary dispute. The sole issue presented on appeal is whether the trial court erred in granting the motion filed by the Plaquemines Parish Government (“PPG”) for limited suspension of a consent judgment, which granted a preliminary injunction, to permit the Belle Chasse Drainage District (“BCDD”) to file an expropriation suit. Finding no error, we affirm.
STATEMENT OF THE CASE
On June 14, 2012, James H. Hooper Jr. and Patsy Spencer Hooper (the “Hoo-pers”) filed a verified petition to confirm boundary, for possessory action, for damages and for injunctive…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Wilson v. City of New OrleansSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1985
- State v. MyersLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1991
- Yokum v. Pat O'Brien's Bar, Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2012
- State v. SimpsonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1981
- State v. JonesSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1981
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Board of Supervisors of Louisiana State University v. Dixie Brewing Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2014
- Easterling v. Estate of MillerLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2015
- James H. Hooper, Jr. and Patsy Hooper v. Hero Lands Company, Allen Hero, and the Parish of PlaqueminesLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2019