Hamill v. McCalla
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion
On Rehearing.
FOSTER, Justice.
The rule which we quoted from Winston v. Browning, supra, to exist in Alabama, was in accordance with the well-settled practice in equity then in existence. The only procedure to secure a personal judgment for the deficiency after foreclosure'was a suit at law. 1 Wiltse on Mortgage Foreclosures, §§ 411, 412; 42 C. J. 58. The statute gave a new right. Teal v. Lewis, 85 Ala. 218, 4 So. 695; Presley v. McLean, 80 Ala. 309. We quote as follows from the latter;
“The effect and operation of the statute are, to confer on the Chancery Courts new and additional power and…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Prout v. HogeSupreme Court of Alabama · 1876
- Sayre v. Elyton Land Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1882
- Langley v. AndrewsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1902
- Hughes v. Hatchett & TrimbleSupreme Court of Alabama · 1876
- Crawford v. Chattanooga Savings BankSupreme Court of Alabama · 1917
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.