Kinningham v. State
Indiana Supreme Court
Prom the Decatur Circuit Court.
1Opinion of the Court
Elliott, C. J. —
Several objections are urged against the indictment upon which the appellant was convicted, but we deem it necessary to notice only one of them. The indictment charges in general terms that the defendant did “unlawfully, feloniously and wilfully attempt to set fire to and burn and destroy a certain frame building, commonly called a barn.-’-’ No act is charged, and the indictment is radically bad. The charge that the defendant did attempt to do a designated thing is really little more than an averment that he intended to do the thing, and to constitute crime there must be both…
2Cited by4 opinions
- Hogan v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1905
- Turner v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1930
- Bond v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1915
- Kinningham v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1889