Pratt v. . N.Y. Central Ins. Co.
New York Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] There are no exceptions to the admission or rejection of evidence relied upon for the reversal of the judgment. The action was tried by the court without a jury. The judge made a finding of facts, and found as a conclusion of law that there was a valid contract of insurance between the parties at the time of the loss by fire of the insured property. There was no request to make other or additional findings of fact; and the only question open to the appellant on…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Frost v. Saratoga Mutual InsuranceNew York Supreme Court · 1848
- Carman v. . PultzNew York Court of Appeals · 1860
- Clark v. JonesCourt for the Trial of Impeachments and Correction of Errors · 1845
- Fish v. . CottenetNew York Court of Appeals · 1871
3Cited by9 opinions
- Titus v. . Glens Falls Insurance CompanyNew York Court of Appeals · 1880
- Manchester v. . Guardian Assurance Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1896
- German-American Insurance v. HumphreySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1896
- Mutual Reserve Fund Life Ass'n v. Cleveland Woolen MillsCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1897
- Behler v. German Mutual Fire Ins.Indiana Supreme Court · 1879
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.