Legal Opinion

Coe v. Hewett

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided May 14, 1958No. 37140PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Quillian, Judge.

This being an action based on the alleged failure of the defendant to provide a safe place for the plaintiff to1 work, it is essential that the petition show that the alleged defect in the machine was the proximate cause of the injury. Vinson v. Willingham Cotton Mills, 2 Ga. App. 53 (4) (58 S. E. 413). The petition alleged that as a result of the machine being defective it became “clogged, stopped up and congested” and was smoking; the plaintiff attempted to lift the “feeding platform” with an improvised handle and in doing so his right hand was struck by one of thejsaws in…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Middle Georgia & Atlantic Ry. Co. v. BarnettSupreme Court of Georgia · 1898
  2. Vinson v. Willingham Cotton MillsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1907
  3. Walker v. Atlanta & West Point RailroadSupreme Court of Georgia · 1898
  4. Wilder v. MillerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1907

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Vaughn v. McDanielCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1968

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API