Legal Opinion

In re the Judicial Settlement of the Account of Ennever

New York Surrogate's Court

Decided June 15, 1921PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Proceeding upon judicial settlement of accounts of an executrix.

1Opinion of the Court

Slater, S.

The questions to be decided herein arise out of a claim and the attempt to prove it. The questions are two in number, the first relating to the several motions made by the counsel for the decedent’s estate, to strike out the testimony of the claimant and, finally, the question upon the merits of the claim.

The claimant, upon the trial, was permitted to say that certain moneys were withdrawn from the bank and given to a certain person with certain instructions. Then such person was called and testified that *33he followed the instructions so given by the claimant, and gave the envelope…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. McKeon v. . Van SlyckNew York Court of Appeals · 1918
  2. Nay v. . CurleyNew York Court of Appeals · 1889
  3. Gangi v. . FradusNew York Court of Appeals · 1920
  4. Clift v. . MosesNew York Court of Appeals · 1889
  5. Leask v. . HoaglandNew York Court of Appeals · 1912

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. In re the Judicial Settlement of the Intermediate Account of Proceedings of BrownNew York Surrogate's Court · 1927
  2. Merker v. MerkerNew York Supreme Court · 1960
  3. In re the Estate of SaltzmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1964

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API