Legal Opinion

Day v. Railroad Co.

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided January 15, 1886Published

Error to the District Court of Portage county. The Pittsburg, Youngstown and Chicago Railroad Company is a corporation under the laws of Ohio, and it was building its road through the village of Kent, in Portage county, Ohio.

Read the full summary

Error to the District Court of Portage county. The Pittsburg, Youngstown and Chicago Railroad Company is a corporation under the laws of Ohio, and it was building its road through the village of Kent, in Portage county, Ohio. It was commencing to grade and build its road on property claimed by Day, Williams & Co. as partners, when, October 1, 1881, they, the plaintiffs in error, commenced an action against the railroad company and others to enjoin the railroad company from entering upon their premises until the right of way was duly condemned and paid for. The property is what was once used…

1Opinion of the CourtEollett, J.

A correct understanding of the facts of this case, set forth and shown in the statement and diagram heretofore, is necessary to the proper application of the legal principles that determine the rights of the parties.

But plaintiffs’ rights depend greatly upon the true construction of the deed of Marvin Kent and wife to them, dated March 3, 1868.

And the defendant’s rights depend upon what was conveyed to its grantor by the trustees ot the Pennsylvania and Ohio Canal Company after the ouster of that company by this court, as shown in the case of The State ex rel. Attorney-General v. Pennsylvania…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Lamb v. RicketsOhio Supreme Court · 1842
  2. Kay v. WatsonOhio Supreme Court · 1848
  3. Benner's Lessee v. PlatterOhio Supreme Court · 1834

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API