Legal Opinion

Coto v. Renfrow

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided February 9, 1993No. 92-200PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

The defendants appeal a money judgment entered in favor of the Department of Environmental Resources of Metropolitan Dade County in the sum of $10,000 based upon the legal determination that defendants had illegally cut the mangroves on a lot (referred to as Lot 4) which they owned at Mashta Point, Key Biscayne.

Under the applicable provisions of the code, it is not the cutting of mangroves, per se, that is denounced; instead, it is the cutting or trimming of mangroves, without a permit, in coastal wetlands or coastal band community which is prohibited. See Dade County Code §§ 24-58(1),…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Holland v. GrossSupreme Court of Florida · 1956
  2. Dixson v. KattelDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1975
  3. Catalina, Inc. v. Biscayne Northeast Corp. of Fla.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1974

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Padgett v. Shands Teaching Hospital and Clinics, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1993
  2. Johnson v. Department of Children & FamiliesDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1999

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API