Legal Opinion
Rohm & Haas Co. v. Aries
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided September 21, 1984No. Misc. No. 18-302PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM DECISION
STEWART, District Judge:
In December of 1964, petitioner Rohm & Haas Company obtained default judgments for $2,288,600 against respondent Robert S. Aries (“Dr. Aries”) in the United States District Court for the District of Connecticut. Thereafter, petitioner registered the judgments in this court and commenced supplementary proceedings. Respondent has moved to dismiss pursuant to Fed.R. Civ.P. 60(b)(4), arguing that the judgments are void due to lack of personal jurisdiction. Petitioner has since filed a motion for summary judgment. For reasons presented below, respondent’s…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Covington Industries, Inc. v. Resintex A. G. And Horst SusskindCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1980
- DiCesare-Engler Productions, Inc. v. Mainman Ltd.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1979
- Russell Fuhrman, D/B/A Russell Fuhrman and Company v. John LivaditisCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1979
- Coleman v. PattersonDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1972
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. Internet Solutions for Business Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
- Bally Export Corporation, a Delaware Corporation v. Balicar, Ltd., a Foreign Corporation, and Juliano Internacional S.A., a Foreign CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1986
- Burda Media, Inc. v. ViertelCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2005
- Burda Media, Inc. v. ViertelCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2005
- Velez v. VassalloDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2002
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.