Legal Opinion

McKenney v. Fawcett

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided November 10, 1890No. 188PublishedCited by 4 opinions

APPEAL BY PLAINTIFFS FROM THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS NO. 1 OF ALLEGHENY COUNTY. No. 188 October Term 1890, Sup. Ct.; court below, No. 590' September Term 1888, C. P. No. 1. On August 6, 1888, a summons was served in an action of assumpsit brought by Samuel S. McKenney and Viola, his wife, in right of said wife, against Thomas Fawcett and Henry Lloyd. Issue.

Read the full summary

APPEAL BY PLAINTIFFS FROM THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS NO. 1 OF ALLEGHENY COUNTY. No. 188 October Term 1890, Sup. Ct.; court below, No. 590' September Term 1888, C. P. No. 1. On August 6, 1888, a summons was served in an action of assumpsit brought by Samuel S. McKenney and Viola, his wife, in right of said wife, against Thomas Fawcett and Henry Lloyd. Issue. At the trial on April 28,1890, evidence was adduced upon which the plaintiff claimed to recover one fourth the value of stock, materials and tools upon a leasehold of a steel furnace, put into the possession of the defendants by the…

1Opinion of the Court

PER C UBI AM:

The only error assigned is that the court below refused to grant a new trial. That such refusal is not reYiewable here, is too well settled to need the citation of authority. “ Let us have peace.”

Judgment affirmed.

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. Weiskircher v. ConnellySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1917
  2. Stern v. JohnstonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1908
  3. Stephens v. GunzenhauserSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1905
  4. Smith v. Times Publishing Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1897

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API