Legal Opinion

State v. Plant, 24118 (9-3-2008)

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided September 3, 2008No. 24118UnpublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DECISION AND JOURNAL ENTRY

{¶ 1} Defendant-Appellant, Philip R. Plant, appeals the trial court's imposition of a greater sentence through a nunc pro tunc entry entered after he had begun serving his sentence. This Court reverses.

I

{¶ 2} Plant was indicted on several felony drug offenses. Pursuant to a plea bargain, Plant plead guilty to aggravated trafficking in drugs in violation of R.C. 2925.03(A)(1), a second degree felony, and the remaining counts were dismissed. In November 2006, the trial court sentenced Plant to serve two years in prison. The sentencing entry does not indicate whether…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Fogle v. SteinerOhio Supreme Court · 1995
  2. State v. GreulichOhio Court of Appeals · 1988
  3. City of Columbus v. MesserOhio Court of Appeals · 1982
  4. State v. ElliottOhio Court of Appeals · 1993
  5. State v. Battle, Cr 03 10 3026 (5-23-2007)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2007

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. RyeOhio Court of Appeals · 2011
  2. State v. ZackOhio Court of Appeals · 2011
  3. State v. OcepekOhio Court of Appeals · 2011

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API