Legal Opinion

Guilford v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided May 18, 2012No. 2D11-4694PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MORRIS, Judge.

Stevon L. Guilford appeals the summary denial of his motion to correct illegal sentence filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a), in which he raised one claim of illegality in the sentencing process. We affirm.

Guilford claimed that in sentencing him to thirty years (the statutory maximum), the trial court erroneously took into account his failure to admit guilt and accept responsibility. The postconviction court denied this claim on the basis that it amounted to a challenge of the sentencing process, which cannot be raised in a rule 3.800(a) motion. See…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Hannum v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2009
  2. Hankins v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2010

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Collier v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2014
  2. Barber v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2014
  3. DASHAUN BROOKS v. STATE OF FLORIDADistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2019
  4. HOWARD RICHMOND v. STATE OF FLORIDADistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2019
  5. MATTHEW WARD v. STATE OF FLORIDADistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2018

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API