Legal Opinion

Stevens v. Pendleton

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided November 21, 1890PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Error to Wayne. (Hosmer, J.) Assunnosit. Plaintiff brings error. The facts are stated in tie opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

Ohamrlin, O. J.

On December 21, 1886, William H. Stevens entered into a contract in writing, by which he agreed to loan and advance to William E. Pendleton not exceeding $10,000, for the purpose of erecting a hotel or road-house, including barns, outhouses, sheds, etc., on land belonging to Stevens, to be built according to the plans and specifications of the architect under the supervision of Pendleton. When it was completed and ready for occupancy, Stevens was to lease the buildings to Pendleton for a period of 10 years from the date of the lease, and he was to pay Stevens 6 per cent,…

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. Stevens v. PendletonMichigan Supreme Court · 1892
  2. Stevens v. PendletonMichigan Supreme Court · 1891
  3. Martinez v. OliverCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1923
  4. Stevens v. PendletonMichigan Supreme Court · 1895

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API