Legal Opinion

Matter of Haviland v. Ellrodt

New York Court of Appeals

Decided October 25, 1935PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Section 249 of the Election Law gives to the independent voters of New Castle the right to a separate row on the ballot and entitles the petitioner to have his name appear therein.

Read the full summary

Section 249 of the Election Law gives to the independent voters of New Castle the right to a separate row on the ballot and entitles the petitioner to have his name appear therein. (.Matter of Crane v. Voorhis, 257 N. Y. 298,) The independent nominees, being the same as the party nominees, are not entitled to a separate row on the voting machine, (.Matter of Haskell v, Voorhis, 246 N, Y. 256; Matter of Callaghan v, Voorhis, 252 N. Y, 14; Matter of Crane v, Voorhis, 257 N. Y. 298; Matter of Shaeffer, 237 App, Div, 278.)

1Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam,

Section 249 of the Election Law (Cons. Laws, ch. 17) provides: “ The names of all candidates nominated by any party or independent body for an office shall always appear in the row or column containing generaEy the names of candidates nominated by such party or independent body for other offices except as hereinafter provided.”

The exceptions thereinafter provided do not include a case where the same person has been nominated by one party and one independent body.

The orders should be reversed and the application of the petitioner granted, without costs.

Crane, Ch. J., Lehman,…

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. Robinson v. BrockAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1938
  2. In re AurelioAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1943

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API