Legal Opinion

Shoolman v. Health Facilities Appeals Board

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided February 7, 1989PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtO’Connor, J.

This case arises under G. L. c. 111, §§ 25B-25G (1984 ed.). 3 The purpose of the statute, known as the determination of need law, is to “prevent unnecessary expansion of health care facilities in the Commonwealth and encourage appropriate allocation of resources for health care purposes.” Commissioner of Pub. Health v. Bessie M. Burke Memorial Hosp., 366 Mass. 734, 735 (1975). The plaintiffs appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court affirming a decision of the Health Facilities Appeals Board approving the Department of Public Health’s (department) grant of a certificate of need to…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Seagram Distillers Co. v. Alcoholic Beverages Control CommissionMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1988
  2. Grocery Manufacturers of America, Inc. v. Department of Public HealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1979
  3. Albert v. Municipal Court of the City of BostonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1983
  4. Gurry v. Board of Public AccountancyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1985
  5. Commissioner of Public Health v. Bessie M. Burke Memorial HospitalMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1975

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Risk Management Foundation of Harvard Medical Institutions, Inc. v. Commissioner of InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1990
  2. Highland Tap of Boston, Inc. v. Commissioner of Consumer Affairs & LicensingMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1992
  3. MRI Associates, Inc. v. Department of Public HealthMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2007
  4. Murby v. Children's Hospital Corp.Massachusetts Superior Court · 2016
  5. Murby v. Children's Hospital Corp.Massachusetts Superior Court · 2016

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API