Anderson Forge & Machine Co. v. Sterling Motor Co.
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Wayne; North, J., presiding. Assumpsit in justice’s court by the Anderson Forge & Machine Company against the Sterling Motor Company for breach of a contract to purchase certain crankshafts. There was judgment for plaintiff, and' defendant appealed to the circuit court. Judgment for-plaintiff. Defendant brings error.
1Opinion of the CourtSteere, J.
This case was commenced in justice’s court in the city of Detroit, where plaintiff had judgment from which defendant took an appeal to the circuit court of Wayne county.. The return of the justice before whom the cause was tried is, except the formal beginning and ending, as follows:. “The parties prosecuted and defended in their individual character. The cause was commenced by summons issued on the 20th day of November, 1916, returnable at my office in the city of Detroit, in said county, on the 1st day of December, 1916, aforesaid, at 9 o’clock in the forenoon.
“The plaintiff declares in an…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Hosmer v. WilsonMichigan Supreme Court · 1859
- Prest-O-Lite Co. v. WidrigMichigan Supreme Court · 1914