Legal Opinion

Jackson v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama

Decided April 26, 1988PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

David Earl Jackson was convicted for manslaughter, sentenced to ten years' imprisonment, and ordered to pay $5,000 to the Victims' Compensation Fund. Five issues are raised on this appeal from that conviction.

I

Jackson argues that the trial court erred in instructing the jury on manslaughter as a lesser included offense of murder and that the jury erred in finding him guilty of manslaughter because there was no rational basis for such a charge and conviction.

The trial court, on its own initiative, charged the jury on manslaughter. Since there was no objection the defendant is precluded from…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. United States v. William Willis, A/K/A William Benton Ziegler, Omar Ashad Mahdi, DefendantsCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1985
  3. Beauregard v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1979
  4. United States v. Walter Richard Smith, A/K/A Bobby SmithCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1979
  5. Biddie v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1987

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Marshall v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1990
  2. Johnson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1989
  3. Booker v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1994
  4. Alford v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1993
  5. Robinson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1990

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API